Comments on: Discovery Channel Propaganda: Attack on the Pentagon http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/ Unleash your potential... Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:42:42 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Janelle Humbert http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8601 Janelle Humbert Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:16:34 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8601 Did any of you have family there? Dead, burned, hurt? Janelle Did any of you have family there? Dead, burned, hurt?
Janelle

]]> By: yourefullofit http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8597 yourefullofit Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:28:43 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8597 Charlotte, Mike: by no means am I going to endeavor to argue with either of you, or throw e-insults in your direction or otherwise. You do live in the land of the free and are entitled to your opinions regardless of what they are. I do not live in DC, and was tucked safely away in my office 7 years ago. Like millions of others, I watched the horrific events unfold on the television- live. I heard the reports of explosions in the WTC (from what I'd consider to be reliable patriots of this great nation- read: heroic fire-fighters et al.). I felt the same anguish countless others felt around the world- not just in America. After the fact, while doing the math, things simply don't add up. It would be remiss of me to go off on some tangent of how what happened this fateful day was the result of some false flag operations or such. You'd both chalk it up to my being a conspirator- or worse. Simply, I'll note that if even 1 single piece of the official story is un-true in any fashion what-so-ever, the entire story of events warrants re-visiting. That would be the minimum requirement due to those who perished needlessly, or gave their lives in vain. Whatever your opinions are, real or perceived- educate yourselves on what is possible and what is not. Such an aircraft performing maneuvers as described within the 'official' story provided to us are simply not possible. Historically, there has only been 3 building collapses EVER as a result of fire, inclusive of being struck by any aircraft- the twin towers and WTC building 7 (which was not struck by anything). Investigate any aircraft wreck site/pictures/data. There is *always* some sort of wreckage to be collected, and damage or forensic evidence on terra-firma to substantiate cause and effect of such tragic events. I implore you both to explore any/all avenues available to you, in an effort to find your own truths (even if your opinions remain as is). Personally, I am disappointed in the Discovery Channel. As a network station which attracts intelligent viewership and targets educational programs etc. I am dumbfounded they would air such a program- simply it's an insult to those able to determine whether or not what they are being informed of, is relative to the visual evidence still available to this day. A plane (especially flown by what any pilot would consider to be an amateur pilot at best) would not be capable of causing damage as described, to the Pentagon. It simply isn't feasible. July 28, 1945, a B-52 bomber flew into the 79th floor of the Empire State building- google it. http://history1900s.about.com/od/1940s/a/empirecrash.htm The building stands today. However, you might not be inclined to believe it. After all, neither of you witnessed it with your own eyes. Regards, Charlotte, Mike: by no means am I going to endeavor to argue with either of you, or throw e-insults in your direction or otherwise. You do live in the land of the free and are entitled to your opinions regardless of what they are.

I do not live in DC, and was tucked safely away in my office 7 years ago.

Like millions of others, I watched the horrific events unfold on the television- live.

I heard the reports of explosions in the WTC (from what I’d consider to be reliable patriots of this great nation- read: heroic fire-fighters et al.). I felt the same anguish countless others felt around the world- not just in America.

After the fact, while doing the math, things simply don’t add up. It would be remiss of me to go off on some tangent of how what happened this fateful day was the result of some false flag operations or such. You’d both chalk it up to my being a conspirator- or worse.

Simply, I’ll note that if even 1 single piece of the official story is un-true in any fashion what-so-ever, the entire story of events warrants re-visiting. That would be the minimum requirement due to those who perished needlessly, or gave their lives in vain.

Whatever your opinions are, real or perceived- educate yourselves on what is possible and what is not. Such an aircraft performing maneuvers as described within the ‘official’ story provided to us are simply not possible. Historically, there has only been 3 building collapses EVER as a result of fire, inclusive of being struck by any aircraft- the twin towers and WTC building 7 (which was not struck by anything).

Investigate any aircraft wreck site/pictures/data. There is *always* some sort of wreckage to be collected, and damage or forensic evidence on terra-firma to substantiate cause and effect of such tragic events. I implore you both to explore any/all avenues available to you, in an effort to find your own truths (even if your opinions remain as is).

Personally, I am disappointed in the Discovery Channel. As a network station which attracts intelligent viewership and targets educational programs etc. I am dumbfounded they would air such a program- simply it’s an insult to those able to determine whether or not what they are being informed of, is relative to the visual evidence still available to this day. A plane (especially flown by what any pilot would consider to be an amateur pilot at best) would not be capable of causing damage as described, to the Pentagon. It simply isn’t feasible.

July 28, 1945, a B-52 bomber flew into the 79th floor of the Empire State building- google it. http://history1900s.about.com/od/1940s/a/empirecrash.htm

The building stands today. However, you might not be inclined to believe it. After all, neither of you witnessed it with your own eyes.

Regards,

]]> By: Charlotte S http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8590 Charlotte S Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:32:16 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8590 <b>Mike, those who did not live in DC at the time or have any sort of connection to the Pentagon don't have a clue! I worked for a well connected man in Washington DC at that time and I know people who had offices in Crystal City who watched the plane fly into the pentagon. I drove by the Pentagon myself 2 days after the attack just so I could witness it with my own eyes and that image will always be in my mind. Thanks for giving your eyewitness account to these chuckle head conspiracty people. <b> Mike, those who did not live in DC at the time or have any sort of connection to the Pentagon don’t have a clue! I worked for a well connected man in Washington DC at that time and I know people who had offices in Crystal City who watched the plane fly into the pentagon. I drove by the Pentagon myself 2 days after the attack just so I could witness it with my own eyes and that image will always be in my mind. Thanks for giving your eyewitness account to these chuckle head conspiracty people.

]]> By: culturesquad http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8582 culturesquad Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:54:12 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8582 great blog. darn interesting too. I'm checking out the sites you mention... Also, loved the Usama Bin Ladin hit! great blog. darn interesting too. I’m checking out the sites you mention… Also, loved the Usama Bin Ladin hit!

]]> By: Ranger Fitzgibbon http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8581 Ranger Fitzgibbon Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:51:32 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8581 Mike M. tell you what, I wasnt there when it happened but I dont buy any of your ground truth for a minute. Ive seen the details albeit after the fact and I did my time in the field not behind a desk or at the water cooler in the Pentagon. Ive seen plenty of wreckage and havoc in my time and the Pentagon debris does not add up at all. And calling people "dude" what is that? What are you 16? As for knocking the Blogger for being "safe and far away" who are you or anyone else at the Pentagon to trash anyone for being safe? For one bad day out of its entire existence? I only wish we had some of you garri-troopers in the field when we were underfunded and way understrength but still expected to get up and do our jobs. Anyway good job on the blog I found it interesting and to the point. No pissing around. Dont let REMF's ruin your day, they like doing that anytime someone is on target. Mike M. tell you what, I wasnt there when it happened but I dont buy any of your ground truth for a minute. Ive seen the details albeit after the fact and I did my time in the field not behind a desk or at the water cooler in the Pentagon. Ive seen plenty of wreckage and havoc in my time and the Pentagon debris does not add up at all. And calling people “dude” what is that? What are you 16? As for knocking the Blogger for being “safe and far away” who are you or anyone else at the Pentagon to trash anyone for being safe? For one bad day out of its entire existence? I only wish we had some of you garri-troopers in the field when we were underfunded and way understrength but still expected to get up and do our jobs.

Anyway good job on the blog I found it interesting and to the point. No pissing around. Dont let REMF’s ruin your day, they like doing that anytime someone is on target.

]]> By: Mike M http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8579 Mike M Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:21:57 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8579 This has to be the worst blog entry ever. Dude, you were not there. I was. I had 53 friends die in this attack. I saw the plane parts all over the grounds. If you were there, you would have too. But you were far away, safe in your house looking at pictures and video, which is only a small part of the scene. I stood at the impact site as it was happening. I know what I saw. There is a saying we have at the Pentagon. Those who don't know the facts make ones up to satisfy themselves, but I don't expect you to understand that. This has to be the worst blog entry ever. Dude, you were not there. I was. I had 53 friends die in this attack. I saw the plane parts all over the grounds. If you were there, you would have too. But you were far away, safe in your house looking at pictures and video, which is only a small part of the scene. I stood at the impact site as it was happening. I know what I saw.

There is a saying we have at the Pentagon. Those who don’t know the facts make ones up to satisfy themselves, but I don’t expect you to understand that.

]]> By: Airliners and Aircrafts » Discovery Channel Propaganda: Attack on the Pentagon Geeks Bearing Gifts http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8453 Airliners and Aircrafts » Discovery Channel Propaganda: Attack on the Pentagon Geeks Bearing Gifts Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:53:13 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8453 [...] Dig deeper into the topic here [...] [...] Dig deeper into the topic here [...]

]]> By: Extefearady http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8300 Extefearady Sat, 05 Jan 2008 16:05:35 +0000 http://xplore.wordpress.com/2007/09/27/discovery-channel-propaganda-attack-on-the-pentagon/#comment-8300 You hit a sore point. Extrefox You hit a sore point.
Extrefox

]]>